How the English Planning System Distributes Its Evidence
A computational-statutory audit of 641 contested planning sites against 65 open-government layers.
A serialised thesis · 11 parts
How the English planning system distributes its evidence — read from the same 641 contested sites and 65 open-government layers that drive the map. Association, not cause; the evidence ladder is stated on every claim.
A computational-statutory audit of 641 contested planning sites against 65 open-government layers.
The nine headline findings in plain English, each with its key empirical anchor and evidence level.
The full statistical tables behind every figure — cohort counts, odds ratios, and significance tests.
The complete doctoral manuscript, from methods to the enclosure argument in full.
The series works through the thesis one conclusion at a time. The same dataset powers the “Context” layers on the planning map, so every figure here can be checked against the map itself.